Three Charged in $30 Million Fraud Scheme
SAN DIEGO, CA—United States Attorney Karen P. Hewitt announced today that Matthew “Beau”
La Madrid of Jamul, Lance La Madrid of El Cajon, and Eric Montiel of San Diego, were charged in a 29-count
indictment with conspiracy, mail fraud, wire fraud, and bank fraud in connection with their operation of the Plus
Money Premium Return Funds and related real estate investment schemes. Matthew La Madrid was also
charged with money laundering and witness tampering. The indictment was handed up by a federal grand jury
sitting in San Diego on July 7, 2009 and unsealed today.
According to the indictment, Matthew “Beau” La Madrid was the President and General Manager of Plus
Money, Inc. (“Plus Money”), an investment group with offices in El Cajon, and also operated businesses related
to real estate investments, including Innovative Financial Solutions (“IFS”), Real Estate Investment Group
(“REIG”), and E & M Property Management, located in San Diego County. It is further alleged that Lance
La Madrid was the Assistant General Manager of Plus Money and the manager of Premium Return Fund III, and
Eric Montiel was the Audit and Communications Officer for Plus Money, the manager of Premium Return Fund
II, and a partner in REIG and E & M Property Management.
The indictment alleges that between May 2004 and May 2008, Plus Money obtained from investors over
$30 million, held in three pools known as Premium Return Fund I, Premium Return Fund II, and Premium
Return Fund III. It is further alleged that the defendants represented to investors that they operated a “covered
calls” stock option trading program and other investment programs involving real estate, falsely promising that
monies invested in the Plus Money funds would be used to trade in “covered call” stock options and that the
monthly payments investors would receive represented income from their investment.
The indictment alleges that the defendants provided the Plus Money investors with false and misleading
account statements indicating that the investment funds were healthy and profitable and that the principal
invested by all participants was intact as of July 13, 2006, when account statements were sent to Plus Money
investors falsely indicating that the brokerage account for Premium Return Fund I contained at least $13 million,
when the account contained only $3 million.
The indictment also alleges that or about September 14, 2007, defendant Matthew “Beau” La Madrid
transferred $5 million from the brokerage accounts for three Premium Return Funds to an account in the name
of Vision Quest Investments; and again on October 9, 2007, La Madrid transferred $2.6 million from the
brokerage accounts of two of the three Premium Return Funds to an account in the name of Vision Quest
Investments, without the knowledge or consent of the Plus Money investors. According to the indictment,
thereafter, on January 15, 2008, the defendants sent account statements to the Plus Money investors falsely
stating that the brokerage accounts for each of the three funds contained at least $8 million, when none of the
funds contained more than $135,000.
The indictment alleges that in order to obtain money from potential investors, the defendants caused
others to fraudulently obtain over $34 million from lenders on home loan applications. It is alleged that the
defendants prepared home loan applications falsely stating that the potential borrowers earned substantial income
as employees of businesses where the borrowers did not in fact work, falsely overstating the borrowers’ assets,
falsely stating that none of the funds used for the down payments were borrowed, and falsely stating the intent
of the borrower to reside on the property. It is further alleged that the defendants fabricated bank statements,
paid a tax preparer to write letters in support of home loan applications, forged the signatures of borrowers and
loan officers on documents, and paid notaries to falsely verify the signatures.
The indictment alleges that the defendants obtained over $4 million from investors for REIG and E & M
Property Management by falsely representing that their investments were fully protected by promissory notes
secured by real property when, in fact, the promissory notes were never recorded as an interest in property and,
in other cases, either the property involved did not contain sufficient equity to secure the investment or the
securing property was sold without repayment to the note holder.
According to the indictment, on August 7, 2008, Matthew “Beau” La Madrid asked an individual to
falsely verify the names of employees and dates of employment that had been falsified for borrowers on loan
documents. The indictment further alleges that on April 9, 2008, the defendants secretly moved the records and
computers from the offices of Plus Money to the residence of a co-conspirator, in order to prevent the investors
from learning the full extent of the fraud and their losses and in order to conceal documents from the Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to prevent their use by the SEC in any proceedings.
On April 28, 2008, the SEC filed an action against Plus Money and Matthew La Madrid, Case No.
08cv0764, alleging securities fraud.
Defendants Matthew La Madrid and Eric Montiel are expected to be arraigned before United States
Magistrate Judge Leo S. Papas today at 1:30 p.m. Lance La Madrid is expected to be arraigned in Arizona later
today.
In separate but related cases, U.S. Attorney Hewitt noted that five other individuals have pled guilty to
federal charges stemming from their role in this scheme.
- On September 15, 2008, Richard Kassler pled guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire
fraud, bank fraud, and securities fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371,
before United States Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo, in Criminal Case No. 08CR3030-
WQH. Kassler is currently scheduled to be sentenced before United States District Court Judge
William Q. Hayes on December 14, 2009.
- On December 22, 2008, Mark Busby and his wife Christine Busby entered pleas of guilty to
conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud and bank fraud, in violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Section 371, before U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major, in Criminal Case
No. 08-CR-4322-H. The Busbys are scheduled to be sentenced on August 10, 2009, before Judge
Hayes.
- On June 29, 2009, James Hyatt entered a plea of guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire
fraud and bank fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371, before U.S.
Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major, in Criminal Case No. 09-CR-2467-DMS. Hyatt is
scheduled to be sentenced on September 18, 2009, before Judge Sabraw.
- On June 30, 2009, Kevin Fallis entered a plea of guilty to the charge of conspiracy to commit
mail fraud, wire fraud and bank fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371,
before U.S. Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks in Criminal Case No. 09-CR-2293-L. Fallis is
scheduled to be sentenced on September 8, 2009, before Judge Lorenz.
All of the pleas are subject to final acceptance by the District Court Judge at the time of sentencing.
| Defendants |
Criminal Case No. 09-CR-2582 |
| Matthew “Beau” La Madrid |
Age: 48 |
Jamul, California |
| Lance La Madrid |
Age: 50 |
El Cajon, California |
| Eric Montiel |
Age: 52 |
San Diego, California |
SUMMARY OF CHARGES
Count 1 Conspiracy in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371
Maximum Penalty: 5 years in custody and/or $250,000 fine
Counts 2-12 Mail Fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341
Maximum Penalty per count: 20 years in custody and/or $250,000 fine
5
Counts 13-19 Wire Fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343
Maximum Penalty per count: 20 years in custody and/or $250,000 fine
Counts 20-23 Bank Fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344
Maximum Penalty per count: 30 years in custody and/or $1,000,000 fine
Counts 24-28 Money Laundering, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1957 (Matthew LaMadrid only)
Maximum Penalty per count: 10 years in custody and/or $250,000 fine
Count 29 Obstruction of Justice, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1512(b)(1) (Matthew LaMadrid only)
Maximum Penalty per count: 20 years in custody and/or $250,000 fine
Forfeiture Allegations, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981, 982 and
Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461
AGENCIES
